August 29, 2025
Aug 23, 2025
3 min
Seth Godin’s Attention Thesis vs. 2025 Reality: What Still Works, What’s Noise
Seth Godin’s Attention Thesis vs. 2025 Reality: What Still Works, What’s Noise

Seth Godin’s Attention Thesis vs. 2025 Reality is the question every marketer should ask before publishing the next piece of content.
His thesis says attention is earned through trust, usefulness, and consistency.
2025 reality adds AI Overviews, zero-click feeds, and algorithmic dopamine loops.
In this guide I cut through the noise and show what still works, what to stop, and how to build a system that compounds.

I’ll cover channels, formats, metrics, and decision rules.
I’ll share templates and checklists you can ship this week.
I’ll point out the traps that waste time and money.
1) What is “attention” in 2025, really
I define attention as voluntary, repeated focus that leads to action.
I refuse vanity definitions like “views” without behavior.
I split attention into three layers.
Reach you didn’t earn.
Engagement you provoked.
Trust you banked.
Keep in mind.
- If they can’t recall you next week, you didn’t earn attention.
- If they didn’t act, you rented a glance.
- If they referred you, you own a piece of mindshare.
2) What still works from Godin’s thesis
Usefulness, consistency, and a clear promise still beat hacks.
People share relief, not noise.
I publish promises I can keep and keep them.
I do this by.
- Writing for one person with one problem.
- Shipping weekly, not sporadically brilliant.
- Showing proof in plain English.
3) What’s noise in 2025 attention games
Endless “growth hacks” that don’t tie to demand are noise.
Posting everywhere without a point of view is noise.
Chasing every new format before mastering one is noise.
I avoid.
- KPI theater with impressions.
- Copying trending hooks without substance.
- Tools that add steps without outcomes.
4) Zero-click search and AI Overviews
AI Overviews and answer engines reduce clicks but increase credibility needs.
I optimize for being cited, summarized, and remembered.
My moves.
- Put concise definitions, steps, and facts near the top.
- Use clean headings and structured lists.
- Provide source-backed claims and dates.
5) Social feeds vs. owned audience
Feeds are rented land.
Owned audience is email, SMS, and community.
I use feeds to earn permission and move people to owned channels.
Weekly cadence.
- Tease in feed.
- Full value in newsletter.
- Dialogue in community.
6) Email still compounds attention
Email is the cheapest, most durable attention channel.
I make every send a promise kept.
I write emails that.
- Solve one problem in five lines.
- Use reply-worthy questions.
- Link to one call to action only.
7) Authority and proof in the AI era
Claims without evidence die in 2025.
I pair each bold line with a receipt.
Proof I use.
- Numbers with timeframes.
- Named customers and quotes.
- Screenshots or short demos.
8) Remarkability beats volume
Purple Cow still wins when the difference is visible and useful.
One remarkable artifact can outperform 20 average posts.
Artifacts to ship.
- A decision tree buyers actually use.
- A free calculator with real assumptions.
- A teardown with hard lessons.
9) POV over aggregation
Summaries are everywhere.
A point of view is rare.
I choose a stance and defend it with logic and data.
POV checklist.
- One claim I’d bet on.
- One risk I acknowledge.
- One action I recommend.
10) Short-form video without the treadmill
Shorts work when they preview depth, not replace it.
I treat short-form as on-ramps to substance.
My format.
- Hook with a pain.
- One insight.
- One next step and where to get it.
11) Community, not just audience
An audience listens.
A community interacts.
I design spaces where peers teach peers.
I set rules that.
- Reward helpful answers.
- Highlight member wins.
- Keep promo out unless invited.
12) Pricing pages as attention engines
Pricing pages are attention bottlenecks.
I turn them into clarity and confidence machines.
I include.
- Who each plan is for.
- What outcomes each tier unlocks.
- Proof and limits in plain English.
13) Events that convert attention into trust
Webinars and workshops work when they create results in the room.
I sell by doing, not by telling.
My event design.
- Live exercises with a template.
- One case with numbers.
- Follow-up checklist within 10 minutes.
14) First-party data and preference centers
Consent is the currency of attention.
I ask for small, specific preferences and honor them.
I implement.
- Topics and cadence controls.
- Easy pause without drama.
- Clear reasons for every ask.
15) Editorial systems that don’t burn out
Attention dies when you miss weeks.
I systemize shipping so consistency survives real life.
System pieces.
- One-page brief.
- 5×5 research sprint.
- Evidence pass.
- CLAPS edit.
- Distribution checklist.
16) Measurement that matches behavior
I replace vanity counters with behavior metrics.
I look for signals that predict revenue.
Leading indicators.
- Replies per 100 opens.
- Time on key sections.
- Form-start to form-finish.
- Repeat visitors from email.
17) Dark social and invisible attention
Slack shares, DMs, and screenshots drive deals you can’t see.
I give people assets worth passing around.
Sharable assets.
- One-page cheat sheets.
- “Before/after” screenshots.
- Decision checklists.
18) Repurposing without dilution
Repurposing is useful when the core insight stays intact.
I adapt by audience and job-to-be-done.
My rule.
- Same promise.
- New wrapper.
- Contextual example.
19) The trust layer in AI assistants
Your assistant needs humility and receipts.
I design mine to say “I’m not sure” and cite sources.
Assistant rules.
- Confidence thresholds.
- Source-first answers.
- Hand-off to human when stakes rise.
20) The 12-week attention plan
Attention compounds with a plan, not vibes.
I run one theme per month and build artifacts that last.
Plan.
- Month 1: Define the problem and ship a calculator.
- Month 2: Publish case studies and a workshop.
- Month 3: Release a decision guide and a pricing explainer.
FAQs
Is attention still scarce in 2025.
Yes.
Noise grew.
Focused, trustworthy voices stayed scarce.
Do AI Overviews kill SEO.
No.
They punish fluff.
They reward structured, source-backed answers.
How often should I publish.
Weekly is ideal.
Daily only works if quality and proof stay high.
What’s the fastest channel to own.
Email.
It compounds and lets you test ideas cheaply.
Do I need short-form video.
Use it as a trailer for depth.
Don’t depend on it for trust.
What metric tells me attention is real.
Replies per 100 opens and repeat direct visits are reliable.
They predict pipeline better than impressions.
How do I stand out without hot takes.
Pick a niche problem.
Offer undeniable clarity and artifacts people use.
Should I post everywhere.
No.
Pick two channels you can master and one you can test.
What’s one thing to stop today.
Publishing without a brief, a proof point, and a CTA.
What role should AI play.
Research and drafting assistant.
Not judgment or claims without evidence.
Conclusion
Seth Godin’s Attention Thesis vs. 2025 Reality isn’t a clash.
It’s a reminder that trust, usefulness, and consistency still win while tactics change around them.
If I design for earned attention, proof, and owned relationships, I’ll grow in any algorithm.
Book a demo at https://hoook.io to see how our customers getting up to 100% traffic growth and up to 20% revenue increase.